Forthcoming PCC Hustings meetings


Birmingham

Organised by Moseley Forum

Date:  7pm on Wednesday 17th October

Venue: St Columbas Church B13 9DD (corner of Alcester Road and Chantry Road)

For more details: http://www.moseleyforum.org.uk/?q=node/293

Birmingham

Organised by BRAP

Date: Thursday 18 October

Time: 6:30pm-8:00pm

Venue: Handsworth Community Fire Safety Centre, 41 Rookery Road Handsworth, Birmingham B21 9QU

For more details:

http://us2.campaign-archive2.com/?u=2f74641cf124f7a1e6c908332&id=e4cbcadebf&e=caf7119a0e

Coventry

Women’s Question Time

Organised by Coventry Women’s Voices

Date Wednesday 31st October 2012

Time 7 to 9pm

Venue Coventry Council House

For more details:

http://coventrywomensvoices.wordpress.com/2012/09/11/what-do-women-in-coventry-want-from-the-new-police-and-crime-commissioner/

Birmingham

Organised by Birmingham Trades Union Council

Date: Thursday 1st November

Time: 8pm

Venue: Birmingham Council House

Birmingham

Event: West Midlands Hustings

Organised The Drum

Date: 6.30pm Wednesday 7th November

Venue: The Drum, Potters Lane, Aston

Please let us know of any further meetings taking place.

Police and Crime Commissioner candidates called to sign the ‘No to privatisation pledge’


Take the pledge!

Anti-privatisation campaigners have called on the candidates standing for election for the post of Police and Crime Commissioner to pledge not to privatise any policing service if elected. West Midlands against Policing for Profit will launch the pledge at a public meeting to be held on Thursday at Birmingham Council House.

All the current candidates including Bob Jones for Labour and Matt Bennett for the Conservatives have declared themselves opposed to the current Business Partnering for Profit programme.  The Business Partnering for Profit contract offered a lucrative potential contract of £1.5bn to private companies to provide policing services including Custody and Forensic services.

The Campaign wants a clear commitment from the PCC candidates that they will oppose all future privatisation of policing services and will be asking them to sign a pledge. The two part pledge reads:

‘1. If elected all Policing services will remain publically provided and retained ‘in-house’ within West Midlands Police Force.

2.West Midlands Police Force will not contract with companies proven to have committed human rights abuses.’

The public meeting has been called by Birmingham Trades Union Council and will include speakers from the UNISON and UNITE representing the Police staff  affected and human rights campaigners including those concerned about the treatment of asylum seekers by private security companies.

A spokesperson for West Midlands against Policing for Profit stated:

We welcome the commitment of the candidates to stop the BPP programme. Some of the shortlisted Private companies have a poor track record in their treatment of vulnerable people in their care and custody. The loss of accountability through the privatisation of policing services has major implications for  civil and human rights.

We want the PCC candidates to declare their position in regards to any privatisation not just the Business Partnering Programme and will accordingly ask them to sign the ‘No Privatisation’ pledge.  Policing isn’t for profit , it’s a core function of the State and there is no room for the shareholder in that equation.

 Details of the Public Meeting

The public meeting will take place on Thursday 27th September at 7pm at Birmingham Council House in Committee Rooms 3 and 4. The speakers include Jill Harrison on behalf of UNISON West Midlands Police Staff Branch, a speaker from UNITE, Dave Stamp from Asirt and Gargi Bhattacharyya for West Midlands against Policing for Profit.

 

West Midlands Police ‘throwing good money after bad!’


In minutes of Thursday’s meeting, Surrey Police Authority members noted that potential police and crime commissioner candidates, due for election in November, were “actively campaigning” to put a stop to the business partnering plan. “It did not seem prudent to continue to invest Surrey tax payers’ money in a programme that may not reach a fruitful conclusion,” the document read.’

 

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7aeeeb66-f83b-11e1-b0e1-00144feabdc0.html#axzz25rVwECA7